eceee
EceISS12_907AD_22mars.gif 

 RSS Feed

Buy Summer Study proceedings

Proceedings.gif

You’re Getting Warmer: Impacts of New Approaches to Residential Demand Reduction

Ken Agnew and Miriam Goldberg, KEMA-XENERGY
Rob Rubin, San Diego Gas and Electric

Keywords

Abstract

San Diego Gas and Electric’s residential Smart Thermostat (ST) Program is a pilot mandated by the California Public Utilities Commission that tests a new combination of paging, Internet, and thermostat technology to raise air conditioner set points remotely. An important feature of the program is customer control of the thermostat both manually and through the Internet, even during re-set events.

The impact evaluation of this program finds that the program savings are lower than targeted by the program plans. Savings reported for the participants in the Statewide Pricing Pilot’s Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) program for the same re-set periods were higher than those for the participants in the ST program. Those in the CPP program had incentives to reduce usage during all peak periods, not just declared critical peaks, and also benefited from both airconditioning and non-air-conditioning usage reductions.

A key factor in the lower-than-targeted savings for the ST program is the timing of the reset events to coincide with statewide emergencies. As a result, the weather is often not hot in San Diego on these days, and many air conditioners are not being used. On the other hand, on warmer days, over-ride rates rise substantially. A stronger penalty structure could reduce the over-ride rate, but would also make program recruitment more challenging; hence, the net effect on program savings and costs is difficult to predict.

While the design constraints appear to limit the savings potential from this program, the impact analysis methods described can be applied to other re-set programs. These methods take advantage of the program’s re-set structure and advanced communications technology. The analysis utilizes end-use metering data for flip-flopping re-set and comparison groups, together with program operational data on signal non-receipt and over-ride rates. The methodology provides estimates that eliminate some key sources of bias while providing good statistical accuracy. The modeling also provides projected future savings as a function of weather and reset magnitude, taking into account both increased potential savings and increased over-ride rates at higher temperatures.

Paper

Download this paper as pdf: 701.pdf

Panels of the 2004 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings

Panel 1. Residential Buildings: Technologies, Design, Performance Analysis, and Building Industry Trends

Panel 2. Residential Buildings: Program Design, Implementation, and Evaluation

Panel 3. Commercial Buildings: Technologies, Design, Performance Analysis, and Building Industry Trends

Panel 4. Commercial Buildings: Program Design, Implementation, and Evaluation

Panel 5. Utility Regulation and Deregulation: Incentives, Strategies, and Policies

Panel 6. Market Transformation: Designing for Lasting Change

Panel 7. Human and Social Dimensions of Energy Use: Trends and Their Implications

Panel 8. Energy and Environmental Policy: Changing the Climate for Energy Efficiency

Panel 9. Efficient Buildings in Efficient Communities

Panel 10. Roundtables: Thinking Outside the Box

Panel 11. Appliances and Equipment

EcoDesign.gifSpringer.gif

European Directives:
Dedicated pages
and policy briefs

Directives.gif