![]() | |||
Smart Growth Policy as an Offset in GHG Cap-and-TradeTherese Langer, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy KeywordsAbstractSmart growth measures can provide substantial reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, but costs and benefits of such measures may be difficult to define and quantify. Even assuming adequate quantification, it is not at all clear that putting a price tag on GHG emissions would provide a substantial incentive to get smart growth programs off the ground. Furthermore, the primary means discussed at present of attaching such a price tag is setting up cap-and-trade programs for GHG emissions, and these programs so far have been designed only for power generators and, in some cases, large industrial emitters. Despite these potential obstacles, we attempt to identify a smart growth measure that could receive credits under a cap-and-trade scheme, in order to consider the obstacles cited in a concrete context. A strong candidate measure will need to be quantifiable, verifiable, and costcompetitive, among other things. Even today, with no GHG cap-and-trade programs in place that cover the transportation sector, devising a smart growth measure that meets these criteria would in fact have practical implications, because the measure could be proposed as an offset for the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), another domestic agreement, or an international one. The analytical underpinning for this effort is the substantial literature documenting the relationship between vehicle miles traveled (VMT) (and therefore GHG emissions) and various community design features such as density, proximity to transit, and walkability. These relationships could allow an existing smart growth zoning program to go far in establishing eligibility for credits in a cap-and-trade program, though some issues remain. These credits would not be sufficient to cover the costs of the program today, but under plausible future scenarios the credits could finance a substantial percentage of program costs. ACEEE thanks the Surdna Foundation for its support of this work. PaperDownload this paper as pdf: 263_750.pdf Panels of the 2006 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in BuildingsPanel 2. Residential Buildings: Program Design, Implementation, and Evaluation Panel 4. Commercial Buildings: Program Design, Implementation, and Evaluation Panel 5. Utility Regulation and Competition: Incentives, Strategies, and Policies Panel 6. Market Transformation: Designing for Lasting Change Panel 7. Human and Social Dimensions of Energy Use: Trends and Their Implications Panel 10. Roundtables and Interactive Sessions: Learning by Doing | CalendarGreen ICT for growth and sustainability? Linking science and policy 03 – 08 Jun 201238th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialist Conference 04 Jun 2012Call for papers MILEN 2012 08 Jun 2012Call for Abstracts - International workshop on energy efficiency for a more sustainable world 12 – 14 Jun 2012IEPEC - International Energy Program Evaluation Conference 15 Jun 2012Call for papers - IIASA Conference 2012. Worlds within reach: from science to policy 20 Jun 2012Energy futures and civil society in the EU - building a low carbon alliance |