The everyday energy use and life-style of families in singel-family houses in Finland

Panel: Panel 3. Human Dimensions of Energy-Use and Conservation

Author:
Heide M. J. Melasniemi-Uutela, Statistics Finland

Abstract

The study examined the residential energy use (electricity and district heat) of SO families of four between 1989-1990. It further investigated the connection between the change taking place 1982-1990 and the life-styles of the families. The goal was to gain a better understanding of the trend in energy consumption and the fwilies É own view of their energy consumption. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used in the study. The houses chosen for the study had electric or district heating. Any use of wood for heating purposes was equated with energy saving. The families differed greatly in their energy consumption, and the differences increased during the period for examination. The majority of the families did not keep track of their energy consumption, and the methods used by those who did keep a check were deficient. Nor did the families consider that the general need to conserve energy applied to them. Three basic types differing in their life-styles and energy use were distinguished, along with their sub-types.

(1) The energy consumption of the Öthrifty wood-burnersË remained at a constant low level. The "habitually frugal" among them were not consciously aware of their energy habits. By contrast the "technically oriented" saved energy by means of technology.

(2)The level of energy consumption of the "ordinary middle-class people" was average and their consumption had risen on average. They were not personally aware of any change in their consumption. The sub-types "water users", "heaters" and "airers" were distinguished.

(3) The high energy consumption of the "comfort-seekers" had continued to rise. These people saw no reason to save energy. Those who "ensured their comfort by means of technology" had invested in energy-saving technology, which lowered their consumption level.