Implementing Differences Renewable Energy Sources vs Energy-Efficient End Use

Panel: Panel 1: Policy and Programmes - Who can deliver DSM?

Author:
Brita Olerup, Stockholm Energi and Lunds University, Sweden

Abstract

The implementation of the two components that form a sustainable energy system differs at the utility level. Two empirical studies suggest that utilities are better placed to develop energy sources than. the end use. Although both strategies involved a new cooperation with new actors that required new knowledge, their implications were different. In the renewable case, a utility buys and uses the product itself, while that is the responsibility of the end user in the efficiency case. A utility can only advise on the end use of energy, contrary to renewable sources where it could even manufacture the fuel and, thus, be in control of all production links itself. Required internal changes for handling renewables were also within accustomed limits, while efficiency added a new dimension. As experience on marketing activities is growing, this knowledge could be transferred to energy sources., If utilities let their customers choose fuel in special contracts, their sales and the financing of investments would be better secured. Concerning efficiency, the state may have to be brought back in for a successful realisation. Its task would be twofold. First, stimulate the development of energy-efficient end use equipment through its funding of research and development. Second, stimulate the penetration of the energy-efficient technology on the market in its capacity as a big purchaser.