Search eceee proceedings

How much energy saving is 1% per year? We still don’t know, but we know better how to find out

Panel: Panel 3. Monitoring & evaluation: understanding change and how to deliver energy efficiency

Authors:
Stefan Thomas, Wuppertal Institute for Climate Environment Energy. Germany
Piet Boonekamp, Energy research Centre of the Netherlands, Netherlands
Harry Vreuls, SenterNovem, Netherlands
Jean-Sébastien Broc, École des Mines de Nantes, France
Didier Bosseboeuf, ADEME, France
Bruno Lapillonne, ENERDATA, France
Nicola Labanca, end-use Efficiency Research Group, Politecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Energia, Italy

Abstract

A crucial prerequisite for the successful implementation of the Energy Service Directive (ESD) is the availability of harmonised calculation methods for the energy savings achieved. Such methods will enable the Member States to prove that they attain the overall target of 9% or more energy savings by 2016. Since 2006, the EMEEES project, implemented under the European Commission’s Intelligent Energy Europe programme by 21 partners and co-ordinated by the Wuppertal Institute, has worked on a set of 20 bottom-up and 14 top-down evaluation methods. It developed (1) an integrated system of bottom-up and top-down methods for the evaluation of energy services and other energy efficiency improvement measures; and (2) a set of harmonised default values for the methods.

The paper presents the overview of the final results on EMEEES’ methods. It discusses the importance of measurement for the effectiveness of the ESD, looking at the quantity to be measured – all or additional energy savings – and early action. It compares the main elements of calculation needed to ensure consistent results between bottom-up and top-down methods and presents how EU Member States can prove achievement of ESD targets by EMEEES’ methods. It also includes preliminary results from field tests of some of the developed methods.

Finally, general conclusions are drawn, e.g., about the difficulties and opportunities of doing research within a political environment with such a mixed consortium, and of trying to reach consensus or compromises in developing a harmonised evaluation system.

Paper

Download this paper as pdf: Paper

Presentation

Download this presentation as pdf: Presentation