Search eceee proceedings
Cost Effective Contributions to New York’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets from Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Resources
Panel: Panel 8. Energy and Environmental Policy: Changing the Climate for Energy Efficiency
Authors:
David G. Hill, Vermont Energy Investment Corporation
Chris Neme, Vermont Energy Investment Corporation
John Plunkett, Optimal Energy, Inc.
Phil Mosenthal, Optimal Energy Inc.
Lawrence J. Pakenas, New York State Energy Research and Development Authority
R. Neal Elliot, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy
Christine Donovan, C.T. Donovan Associates
Abstract
This paper summarizes the results of a comprehensive analysis of the potential for energy efficiency and renewable energy resources in New York. The study includes characterization and market analysis of over 3,400 efficiency measure permutations and 30 renewable energy technologies. A key element of the study is the development of an integrated supply curve for achievable efficiency savings and renewable energy generation. This curve identifies the leastcost portfolio of investments in efficiency and renewables needed to meet reduced levels of conventional (i.e., fossil fuel) electricity generation. Projecting from market intervention strategies that have proven successful in the past, the study concludes that efficiency and renewable energy could be expected to reduce New York State’s electricity generation requirements by more than 19,939 GWh annually by 2012, and by more than 27,244 GWh by 2022. This energy represents 12.7% and 16.1% of expected statewide requirements for those years. These contributions could be achieved at a net levelized energy cost of less than 3 cents per kilowatt hour, which is below those of the conventional electric generation they would avoid. The total net resource benefits attained by implementing the least-cost mix of renewable and efficiency resources are estimated to exceed $4.5 billion in 2012 and $9 billion in 2022. The results support the conclusion that New York will be significantly better off economically if it pursues a least-cost portfolio of efficiency and renewable energy resources to meet its electric sector’s greenhouse gas reduction targets.Paper
Download this paper as pdf: Paper
Panels of
Panel 2. Residential Buildings: Program Design, Implementation, and Evaluation
Panel 4. Commercial Buildings: Program Design, Implementation, and Evaluation
Panel 6. Market Transformation: Designing for Lasting Change
Panel 5. Utility Regulation and Deregulation: Incentives, Strategies, and Policies
Panel 7. Human and Social Dimensions of Energy Use: Trends and Their Implications
Panel 9. Efficient Buildings in Efficient Communities
Panel 8. Energy and Environmental Policy: Changing the Climate for Energy Efficiency